People v. Davis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Davis

127 A.D.3d 1104, 5 N.Y.S.3d 890

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 22, 2015

Docket2013-05479

StatusPublished

This text of 127 A.D.3d 1104 (People v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Davis, 127 A.D.3d 1104, 5 N.Y.S.3d 890 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohen, J.), rendered April 22, 2013, convicting him of burglary in the third degree and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the testimony of a police officer impermissibly bolstered the complainant’s testimony (see People v Trowbridge, 305 NY 471 [1953]) is without merit (see People v Brown, 120 AD3d 710 [2014]; People v Santiago, 265 AD2d 351, 352 [1999]).

The defendant’s contention that the verdict was repugnant is unpreserved for appellate review, as he failed to raise this issue before the jury was discharged (see People v Alfaro, 66 NY2d 985, 987 [1985]; People v Boley, 116 AD3d 965, 966 [2014]; People v Jackson, 101 AD3d 1153 [2012]; People v Shamsiddeen, 98 AD3d 694 [2012]). In any event, this contention is without merit (see People v Dorvilier, 122 AD3d 642 [2014]).

Eng, P.J., Dillon, Chambers and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI