People v. Jackson

93 A.D.3d 496, 939 N.Y.S.2d 854

This text of 93 A.D.3d 496 (People v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Jackson, 93 A.D.3d 496, 939 N.Y.S.2d 854 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene D. Goldberg, J.), entered on or about June 15, 2009, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure to risk level one (see People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 568 n 2 [2009]; People v Johnson, 11 NY3d 416, 421 [2008]). Defendant did not demonstrate any mitigating factors not taken into account by the risk assessment instru[497]*497ment that would warrant a downward departure. Furthermore, the mitigating factors cited by defendant were outweighed by the seriousness of the underlying sex offense, as well as defendant’s criminal history. Concur — Tom, J.P., Saxe, Acosta, DeGrasse and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Mingo
910 N.E.2d 983 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)
People v. Johnson
900 N.E.2d 930 (New York Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 A.D.3d 496, 939 N.Y.S.2d 854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jackson-nyappdiv-2012.