People v. Dolberry
This text of 95 A.D.3d 1357 (People v. Dolberry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D’Emic, J.), imposed October 13, 2010, which, upon his conviction of arson in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, imposed a period of postrelease supervision in addition to the determinate term of imprisonment previously imposed on January 2, 2002.
Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, his resentencing to a term which included the statutorily required period of post-release supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law, since, at the time he was resentenced, he had not yet completed the sentence of imprisonment originally imposed upon him (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621, 630, 632 [2011]; People v Louis, 90 AD3d 1075 [2011]; People v Mills, 90 AD3d 1076 [2011]; People v Dawkins, 87 AD3d 550 [2011]; People v Harris, 86 AD3d 543, 543-544 [2011]).
The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d at 635; People v Edwards, 89 AD3d 1034, 1035 [2011]). Rivera, J.E, Chambers, Roman and Miller, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
95 A.D.3d 1357, 944 N.Y.S.2d 924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dolberry-nyappdiv-2012.