People v. Flores

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Flores

224 A.D.2d 543, 638 N.Y.S.2d 344, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1150

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 13, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 224 A.D.2d 543 (People v. Flores) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Flores, 224 A.D.2d 543, 638 N.Y.S.2d 344, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1150 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Nassau County (Boklan, J.), both rendered July 29, 1994, convicting him of burglary in the second degree (five counts) under Indictment No. 86802 and burglary in the second degree under Indictment No. 87151, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

[544]*544We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Joy, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Nassau County (Boklan, J.), both rendered July 29, 1994, convicting him of burglary in the second degree (five counts) under Indictment No. 86802 and burglary in the second degree under Indictment No. 87151, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

[544]*544We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Joy, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

224 A.D.2d 543, 638 N.Y.S.2d 344, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-flores-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack