Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Flores

People v. Flores

224 A.D.2d 543, 638 N.Y.S.2d 344, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1150
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Flores. Read the opinion of the Court — 210 A.D.2d 1 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 13, 1996·Published

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Nassau County (Boklan, J.), both rendered July 29, 1994, convicting him of burglary in the second degree (five counts) under Indictment No. 86802 and burglary in the second degree under Indictment No. 87151, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

[544]*544We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Joy, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Flores, 224 A.D.2d 543, 638 N.Y.S.2d 344, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1150 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

224 A.D.2d 543 (People v. Flores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)