People v. Figueroa

216 A.D.2d 578, 628 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7025
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Figueroa. Read the opinion of the Court — 195 A.D.2d 477

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Curci, J.), rendered October 14,1994, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that she had violated a condition thereof, after a hearing, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon her previous conviction of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

Although the court voiced its displeasure with the defense counsel’s dilatory tactics at the violation of probation hearing, under the circumstances, where, inter alia, there was no viable [579]*579defense to the charge that the defendant had violated her probation by being convicted of another crime, the court’s actions in no way resulted in a denial of effective assistance of counsel or indeed, any diseernable prejudice (see, People v Rodriguez, 188 AD2d 623). Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Figueroa, 216 A.D.2d 578, 628 N.Y.S.2d 574, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7025 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

216 A.D.2d 578 (People v. Figueroa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rodriguez
188 A.D.2d 623 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)