People v. Figueroa

194 A.D.2d 551, 599 N.Y.S.2d 978
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 1, 1993·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Meyerson, J.), rendered January 11, 1991, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the People exercised their peremptory challenges in a racially discriminatory manner is baseless (see, Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79). The Supreme Court properly concluded that the defendant failed to make out a prima facie showing that the prosecution purposefully excluded prospective jurors on the basis of their ethnic identities (see, People v Childress, 81 NY2d 263; People v Steele, 79 NY2d 317, 325; People v Simmons, 79 NY2d 1013; cf., People v Bolling, 79 NY2d 317, 324-325; People v Jenkins, 75 NY2d 550, 556-557).

Furthermore, the Court of Appeals has rejected the defendant’s argument "that, regardless of race, 'minorities’ in general constitute a cognizable racial group” (People v Smith, 81 NY2d 875, 876). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Ritter and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Figueroa, 194 A.D.2d 551, 599 N.Y.S.2d 978 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

194 A.D.2d 551 (People v. Figueroa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Stiff
206 A.D.2d 235 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Mathews
201 A.D.2d 588 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)