People v. Figueroa

197 A.D.2d 633, 604 N.Y.S.2d 762
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 18, 1993·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), rendered October 3, 1989, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

[634]*634Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

In addition to challenging the sufficiency and weight of the evidence, the defendant contends that he was denied a fair trial by the inadequacy of the court-appointed interpreter’s translations. However, the defendant made no record of any errors in the translation which would provide this Court with a basis for reversal (see, People v Rolston, 109 AD2d 854, 855).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Ritter, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Figueroa, 197 A.D.2d 633, 604 N.Y.S.2d 762 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

197 A.D.2d 633 (People v. Figueroa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Arreaga
17 A.D.3d 604 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)