People v. Fernandez

8 A.D.3d 401, 777 N.Y.S.2d 761, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7785
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 7, 2004·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rios, J.), rendered August 19, 2002, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree (three counts), and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10 [1995]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245 [1989]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]). Prudenti, P.J., Krausman, Townes and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Fernandez, 8 A.D.3d 401, 777 N.Y.S.2d 761, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7785 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

8 A.D.3d 401 (People v. Fernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Fernandez
43 A.D.3d 1177 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)