People v. Dunn, Gentile

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Dunn, Gentile

84 N.E.2d 635, 298 N.Y. 865

New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 24, 1949·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Upon reargument of appeals by appellants John M. Dunn and Daniel Gentile: Judgments of conviction affirmed. No opinion.

Concur: LoughbaN, Ch. J., Lewis, CoNway and Fuld, JJ. DesmoNd and Dye, JJ., dissent, and vote to reverse and order a new trial on the ground that the newly discovered evidence could well change the result if presented to a jury and, accordingly, should he so presented. [See 298 N. Y. 564, 706, 929.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon reargument of appeals by appellants John M. Dunn and Daniel Gentile: Judgments of conviction affirmed. No opinion.

Concur: LoughbaN, Ch. J., Lewis, CoNway and Fuld, JJ. DesmoNd and Dye, JJ., dissent, and vote to reverse and order a new trial on the ground that the newly discovered evidence could well change the result if presented to a jury and, accordingly, should he so presented. [See 298 N. Y. 564, 706, 929.]

People v. Dunn, Gentile, 84 N.E.2d 635, 298 N.Y. 865 (N.Y. 1949).

Pincite

84 N.E.2d 635 (People v. Dunn, Gentile) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related