Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Dunn, Gentile

People v. Dunn, Gentile

84 N.E.2d 635, 298 N.Y. 865
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 24, 1949
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 84 N.E.2d 635 (People v. Dunn, Gentile) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Dunn, Gentile, 84 N.E.2d 635, 298 N.Y. 865 (N.Y. 1949).

Opinion

Upon reargument of appeals by appellants John M. Dunn and Daniel Gentile: Judgments of conviction affirmed. No opinion.

Concur: LoughbaN, Ch. J., Lewis, CoNway and Fuld, JJ. DesmoNd and Dye, JJ., dissent, and vote to reverse and order a new trial on the ground that the newly discovered evidence could well change the result if presented to a jury and, accordingly, should he so presented. [See 298 N. Y. 564, 706, 929.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Dunn, Gentile
85 N.E.2d 68 (New York Court of Appeals, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 N.E.2d 635, 298 N.Y. 865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dunn-gentile-ny-1949.