People v. Dunn, Gentile

85 N.E.2d 68, 298 N.Y. 929
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Dunn, Gentile. Read the opinion of the Court — 298 N.Y. 706
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 4, 1949·Published

Opinion

Application to amend remittitur granted. Recall of remittitur requested and when returned it will he amended by adding thereto the following: “ Upon this appeal there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: The defendants argued that the denial of the motion for a new trial deprived them of due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. This court held that the denial of the motion did not violate any rights guaranteed to the defendants by said provision of the United States Constitution.” [See 298 N. Y. 865.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Dunn, Gentile, 85 N.E.2d 68, 298 N.Y. 929 (N.Y. 1949).

85 N.E.2d 68 (People v. Dunn, Gentile) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Dunn, Gentile
84 N.E.2d 635 (New York Court of Appeals, 1949)