People v. Dominguez

275 A.D.2d 468, 713 N.Y.S.2d 129, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8922
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 28, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 275 A.D.2d 468 (People v. Dominguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Dominguez, 275 A.D.2d 468, 713 N.Y.S.2d 129, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8922 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.), rendered July 29, 1997, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

[469]*469The defendant’s contention that reversible error occurred because of prosecutorial misconduct is not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245, 248-252). In any event, it is without merit. The references to the ethnic origin of the defendant during the opening statement and upon the direct testimony of the prosecution witnesses did not constitute a “ ‘thematic reference to * * * race’ ” as to warrant reversal (People v Ali, 158 AD2d 460; People v Rivera, 136 AD2d 520, affd 73 NY2d 941; cf., People v Thomas, 129 AD2d 596). Additionally, the prosecutor’s statements during summation were a fair comment on the evidence (see, People v Ashwal, 39 NY2d 105; People v Plowden, 236 AD2d 489) or responsive to arguments presented in the defense counsel’s summation (see, People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Bracken, J. P., Santucci, McGinity and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Medina
171 N.Y.S.3d 175 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Lewis
46 A.D.3d 943 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Williams
305 A.D.2d 703 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
People v. Baker
280 A.D.2d 964 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Woods
278 A.D.2d 176 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
275 A.D.2d 468, 713 N.Y.S.2d 129, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-dominguez-nyappdiv-2000.