People v. Plowden

236 A.D.2d 489, 654 N.Y.S.2d 610, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1183
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 10, 1997·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of [490] the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lipp, J.), rendered April 10, 1995, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s arguments regarding alleged prosecutorial misconduct during summation are largely unpreserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Dien, 77 NY2d 885; People v Nuccie, 57 NY2d 818). In any event, the comments alleged to be inflammatory and prejudicial were all either fair comment on the evidence (People v Ashwal, 39 NY2d 105) or responsive to arguments presented in the defense counsel’s summation (People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396). Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Pizzuto and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Plowden, 236 A.D.2d 489, 654 N.Y.S.2d 610, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1183 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

236 A.D.2d 489 (People v. Plowden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Dominguez
275 A.D.2d 468 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Plowden v. Romine
78 F. Supp. 2d 115 (E.D. New York, 1999)
People v. Plowden
262 A.D.2d 504 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)