People v. Diaz

2019 NY Slip Op 6199
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Diaz. Read the opinion of the Court — 146 A.D.3d 803
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 21, 2019·No. Ind. No. 1346/15·Published

Opinion

People v Diaz (2019 NY Slip Op 06199)
People v Diaz
2019 NY Slip Op 06199
Decided on August 21, 2019
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on August 21, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J.
HECTOR D. LASALLE
BETSY BARROS
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

2017-06031
(Ind. No. 1346/15)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Joshua Diaz, appellant.


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Samuel Barr of counsel), for appellant.

John M. Ryan, Acting District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, William H. Branigan, and Vinnette K. Campbell of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Evelyn L. Braun, J.), rendered April 27, 2017, convicting him of assault in the second degree, resisting arrest, and theft of services, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), we find that it was legally sufficient to disprove the defendant's justification defense and to establish the defendant's guilt of assault in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v Chiddick, 8 NY3d 445, 447; People v Perry, 122 AD3d 775, 776; People v Saeed, 60 AD3d 975, 977; People v Williams, 23 AD3d 589). Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342), we nevertheless accord great deference to the fact-finder's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v Mateo, 2 NY3d 383; People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt as to that crime was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633).

SCHEINKMAN, P.J., LASALLE, BARROS and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Diaz, 2019 NY Slip Op 6199 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

2019 NY Slip Op 6199 (People v. Diaz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mateo
811 N.E.2d 1053 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)
People v. Chiddick
866 N.E.2d 1039 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)
People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)
People v. Romero
859 N.E.2d 902 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Perry
122 A.D.3d 775 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Williams
23 A.D.3d 589 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Saeed
60 A.D.3d 975 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)