People v. Diaz

2017 NY Slip Op 7749, 155 A.D.3d 766, 63 N.Y.S.3d 245
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Diaz. Read the opinion of the Court — 146 A.D.3d 803
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 8, 2017·No. 2014-11797·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lopresto, J.), imposed November 13, 2014, as amended November 21, 2014, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337 [2015]; People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Boney, 130 AD3d 1057, 1057 [2015]).

Eng, P.J., Dillon, Miller, Hinds-Radix and Iannacci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Diaz, 2017 NY Slip Op 7749, 155 A.D.3d 766, 63 N.Y.S.3d 245 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 7749 (People v. Diaz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

The People v. Rasaun Sanders
34 N.E.3d 344 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Boney
130 A.D.3d 1057 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)