People v. DeLaRosa

202 A.D.2d 242, 610 N.Y.S.2d 766, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2337

• Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
• Decided: March 8, 1994
• Status: Published

Opinion

—Motion to reinstate appeal denied. Concur — Kupferman, Ross and Nardelli, JJ.

Sullivan, J. P., dissents in a memorandum as follows: In accordance with the views expressed in my dissent in our prior decision (People v DeLaRosa, 192 AD2d 403, lv granted 81 NY2d 1082, appeal withdrawn 82 NY2d 750), I would grant the motion and reinstate the appeal. Our recently enacted amendment to 22 NYCRR 600.8, adding, inter alia, subdivision (f), effective February 1, 1993, which, in the case of a People’s appeal, requires personal service of the appellant’s brief upon an unrepresented defendant, had not yet been promulgated when the People filed their brief in this matter.