People v. DeLaRosa

202 A.D.2d 242, 610 N.Y.S.2d 766, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2337
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. DeLaRosa. Read the opinion of the Court — 218 A.D.2d 667

Opinion

—Motion to reinstate appeal denied. Concur — Kupferman, Ross and Nardelli, JJ.

Sullivan, J. P., dissents in a memorandum as follows: In accordance with the views expressed in my dissent in our prior decision (People v DeLaRosa, 192 AD2d 403, lv granted 81 NY2d 1082, appeal withdrawn 82 NY2d 750), I would grant the motion and reinstate the appeal. Our recently enacted amendment to 22 NYCRR 600.8, adding, inter alia, subdivision (f), effective February 1, 1993, which, in the case of a People’s appeal, requires personal service of the appellant’s brief upon an unrepresented defendant, had not yet been promulgated when the People filed their brief in this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. DeLaRosa, 202 A.D.2d 242, 610 N.Y.S.2d 766, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2337 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

202 A.D.2d 242 (People v. DeLaRosa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. DeLaRosa
192 A.D.2d 403 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)