People v. Delarosa

191 A.D.2d 453, 596 N.Y.S.2d 700
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Delarosa. Read the opinion of the Court — 218 A.D.2d 667

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brill, J.), rendered September 27, 1990, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that the Supreme Court erred in imposing sentence in the absence of a certified court interpreter is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). In any event, a review of the sentencing minutes reveals that a court interpreter was, in fact, present. Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Miller, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Delarosa, 191 A.D.2d 453, 596 N.Y.S.2d 700 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

191 A.D.2d 453 (People v. Delarosa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pellegrino
454 N.E.2d 938 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Lopez
525 N.E.2d 5 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)