People v. Delarosa

191 A.D.2d 453, 596 N.Y.S.2d 700

This text of 191 A.D.2d 453 (People v. Delarosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Delarosa, 191 A.D.2d 453, 596 N.Y.S.2d 700 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brill, J.), rendered September 27, 1990, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that the Supreme Court erred in imposing sentence in the absence of a certified court interpreter is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). In any event, a review of the sentencing minutes reveals that a court interpreter was, in fact, present. Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Miller, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Pellegrino
454 N.E.2d 938 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Lopez
525 N.E.2d 5 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 A.D.2d 453, 596 N.Y.S.2d 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-delarosa-nyappdiv-1993.