Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. David

People v. David

95 A.D.3d 901, 942 N.Y.S.2d 881
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 1, 2012
StatusPublished

This text of 95 A.D.3d 901 (People v. David) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. David, 95 A.D.3d 901, 942 N.Y.S.2d 881 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Application by the ap[902]*902pellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated September 15, 2009 (.People v David, 65 AD3d 1163 [2009]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered January 31, 2007.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Mastro, A.P.J., Rivera, Eng and Lott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Barnes
463 U.S. 745 (Supreme Court, 1983)
People v. Stultz
810 N.E.2d 883 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)
People v. David
65 A.D.3d 1163 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 A.D.3d 901, 942 N.Y.S.2d 881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-david-nyappdiv-2012.