People v. Armstead

122 A.D.3d 640, 994 N.Y.S.2d 543
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 5, 2014·No. 2012-07212·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Gulotta, Jr., J.), rendered July 9, 2012, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

*641 Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree and vacating the sentence imposed thereon; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant, by his plea of guilty, forfeited his right to challenge the geographic jurisdiction of Nassau County to prosecute the charged offense (see People v De Alvarez, 59 AD3d 732 [2009]; People v Pickens, 256 AD2d 425 [1998]; People v Gesualdi, 247 AD2d 629 [1998]).

As the People correctly concede, the Supreme Court erred in eliciting the defendant’s plea of guilty to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, because the previous dismissal of that count constituted a bar to any further prosecution on such charge (see CPL 210.20 [4]; People v David, 95 AD3d 1031 [2012]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his pro se supplemental brief, are without merit.

Balkin, J.R, Chambers, Miller and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Armstead, 122 A.D.3d 640, 994 N.Y.S.2d 543 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

122 A.D.3d 640 (People v. Armstead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Smith
178 N.Y.S.3d 456 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Norris
203 A.D.3d 1074 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)