People v. McNab

167 A.D.2d 858, 562 N.Y.S.2d 590, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14404
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 16, 1990
StatusPublished
Cited by69 cases

This text of 167 A.D.2d 858 (People v. McNab) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. McNab, 167 A.D.2d 858, 562 N.Y.S.2d 590, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14404 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and indictment dismissed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of one count each of rape in the first degree and assault in the second degree; he was acquitted of six counts of rape in the first degree and two counts of sodomy. Defendant’s rape conviction must be reversed. Defendant was indicted on seven identical counts of rape by forcible compulsion, the complainant testified at trial that nine acts of rape occurred, and the jury convicted him of only the seventh count of rape. It is impossible to ascertain what alleged act of rape was found by the jury to have occurred, whether it was one of the seven for which he was indicted, or indeed whether different jurors convicted defendant based on different acts. Reversal is required because the jury may have convicted defendant of an unindicted rape, resulting in the usurpation by the prosecutor of the exclusive power of the Grand Jury to determine the charges (see, People v Grega, 72 NY2d 489, 495-496). Because defendant’s right to be tried and convicted of only those crimes charged in the indictment is fundamental and nonwaivable, we reach this issue despite the fact that it is unpreserved (see, People v Rubin, 101 AD2d 71, 77). Furthermore, appellate review is impossible without implicating the prohibition against double jeopardy (see, People v Knight, 161 AD2d 668; People v Caliendo, 158 AD2d 531). The same reasoning applies to the assault conviction, because the complainant testified to more than one act of assault, but defendant was indicted on only one count.

[859]*859We have examined defendant’s remaining arguments on appeal and find that none requires reversal. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Mark, J.—rape, first degree.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Pine, and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Zona
2024 NY Slip Op 01652 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
People v. Barber
2017 NY Slip Op 7807 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
BOX, BRANDON W., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016
UTLEY, MARK W., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
DUKES, ROBERT, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
People v. Dukes
122 A.D.3d 1370 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
WADE, MICHAEL, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
MARTINEZ, DARIO M., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
People v. Wade
118 A.D.3d 1370 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Martinez
118 A.D.3d 1446 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
WILLIAMS, SHUVON J., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
People v. Williams
118 A.D.3d 1295 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
CASIANO, OLGA, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
People v. Casiano
117 A.D.3d 1507 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
REID, DANHAILE R., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
People v. Reid
117 A.D.3d 1448 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
LINDER, ADONIS, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
THOMAS, JEFFREY, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
People v. Thomas
114 A.D.3d 1138 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Linder
114 A.D.3d 1200 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 A.D.2d 858, 562 N.Y.S.2d 590, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-mcnab-nyappdiv-1990.