People v. Cruz

28 A.D.3d 675, 813 N.Y.S.2d 222
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 18, 2006·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered August 13, 2004, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the County Court failed to comply with CPL 400.21 before sentencing him as a second felony offender is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Csoke, 11 AD3d 631 [2004]; cf. People v Proctor, 79 NY2d 992, 994 [1992]). In any event, the County Court substantially complied with the statute, and there is no indication that the defendant contemplated a challenge to the constitutionality of his prior conviction. Consequently, the alleged deficiencies were harmless oversights (see People v Hickman, 276 AD2d 563, 564 [2000]; People v Witherspoon, 155 AD2d 636, 637 [1989]). Miller, J.P., Crane, Luciano and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Cruz, 28 A.D.3d 675, 813 N.Y.S.2d 222 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

28 A.D.3d 675 (People v. Cruz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Luisi
81 A.D.3d 980 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Williams
48 A.D.3d 715 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Flores
40 A.D.3d 876 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)