People v. Proctor
This text of 594 N.E.2d 929 (People v. Proctor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[994]*994OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed. Not having raised the issue by motion to vácate or otherwise in the court of first instance, defendant’s argument that there was a failure to comply with the procedures of CPL 400.20 has not been preserved for our review (People v Oliver, 63 NY2d 973; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). Defendant’s remaining claim is meritless.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
594 N.E.2d 929, 79 N.Y.2d 992, 584 N.Y.S.2d 435, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-proctor-ny-1992.