Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Roberts

People v. Roberts

120 A.D.3d 1360, 991 N.Y.S.2d 902, 2014 NY Slip Op 06214, 2014 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6173
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 17, 2014
Docket2013-04414
StatusPublished

This text of 120 A.D.3d 1360 (People v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Roberts, 120 A.D.3d 1360, 991 N.Y.S.2d 902, 2014 NY Slip Op 06214, 2014 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6173 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Arriaga, J.), imposed March 26, 2013, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentencé is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255-256 [2006]).

Eng, EJ, Balkin, Dickerson, Chambers and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 A.D.3d 1360, 991 N.Y.S.2d 902, 2014 NY Slip Op 06214, 2014 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-roberts-nyappdiv-2014.