People v. Roberts
120 A.D.3d 1360, 991 N.Y.S.2d 902, 2014 NY Slip Op 06214, 2014 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6173
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 17, 2014·No. 2013-04414·Published
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Arriaga, J.), imposed March 26, 2013, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentencé is affirmed.
The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255-256 [2006]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Roberts, 120 A.D.3d 1360, 991 N.Y.S.2d 902, 2014 NY Slip Op 06214, 2014 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6173 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).
120 A.D.3d 1360 (People v. Roberts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)