People v. Csoke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Csoke

11 A.D.3d 631, 782 N.Y.S.2d 657, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12221

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 18, 2004·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Molea, J.), rendered January 15, 2003, convicting him of attempted assault in the second degree and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court erred in adjudicating him a second felony offender is unpreserved for appellate review since he did not controvert the allegations in the predicate felony statement, or object to the procedures used by the court in determining his status (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Smith, 73 NY2d 961 [1989]; People v Todd, 306 AD2d 504 [2003]; People v Alston, 289 AD2d 339 [2001]). In any event, the defendant’s claim that his adjudication as a second felony offender was based upon a foreign conviction is contradicted by the record, which demonstrates that his prior felony conviction occurred in Delaware County, New York. Prudenti, P.J., Krausman, Adams and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Molea, J.), rendered January 15, 2003, convicting him of attempted assault in the second degree and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court erred in adjudicating him a second felony offender is unpreserved for appellate review since he did not controvert the allegations in the predicate felony statement, or object to the procedures used by the court in determining his status (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Smith, 73 NY2d 961 [1989]; People v Todd, 306 AD2d 504 [2003]; People v Alston, 289 AD2d 339 [2001]). In any event, the defendant’s claim that his adjudication as a second felony offender was based upon a foreign conviction is contradicted by the record, which demonstrates that his prior felony conviction occurred in Delaware County, New York. Prudenti, P.J., Krausman, Adams and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

People v. Csoke, 11 A.D.3d 631, 782 N.Y.S.2d 657, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12221 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

11 A.D.3d 631 (People v. Csoke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related