People v. Colonna
This text of 135 A.D.2d 724 (People v. Colonna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Lawrence, J.), rendered December 13, 1983, convicting him of robbery in the second degree and burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We find no basis to conclude that the defendant was deprived of a fair trial by the prosecutor’s remarks during summation. Although we disapprove of the prosecutor’s characterization of the defense theory as a "conspiracy” by the police to frame the defendant (see, People v Cowan, 111 AD2d 343), the remarks were in response to the defense counsel’s summation theory of police misconduct (see, People v Mitchell, 114 AD2d 978, lv denied 67 NY2d 654). Nor did the prosecutor’s remark that if the police were going to frame the defendant they could have done a better job constitute personal vouchering for the officers’ credibility (cf., People v McKutchen, 76 AD2d 934).
The sentence imposed was not unduly harsh or excessive. We find neither an abuse of discretion nor a failure to observe sentencing principles (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mollen, P. J., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
135 A.D.2d 724, 522 N.Y.S.2d 625, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-colonna-nyappdiv-1987.