People v. Velez

179 A.D.2d 834
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 27, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 179 A.D.2d 834 (People v. Velez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Velez, 179 A.D.2d 834 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

By virtue of his guilty plea, the defendant forfeited the right to appellate review of the denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment for violation of his statutory right to a speedy trial (see, People v O’Brien, 56 NY2d 1009; People v Friscia, 51 NY2d 845; cf., People v Shepphard, 177 AD2d 668; CPL 30.30). Moreover, the defendant bargained for and received the statutorily authorized minimum sentence for the crime to which he pleaded guilty (see, Penal Law § 70.00 [2], [3]; see also, § 220.43). Therefore, his challenge to his sentence is without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Harwood and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Penna
203 A.D.2d 392 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 A.D.2d 834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-velez-nyappdiv-1992.