People v. Coles

240 A.D.2d 419, 658 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5764
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 2, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 240 A.D.2d 419 (People v. Coles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Coles, 240 A.D.2d 419, 658 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5764 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J.), rendered January 5, 1996, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and assault in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that his guilty plea was coerced is not preserved for appellate review. The defendant did not move to vacate his guilty plea, nor did he otherwise raise this issue before the County Court (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Bartlett, 215 AD2d 489). In any event, the record of the plea proceedings establishes that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently pleaded guilty (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9).

[420]*420The defendant’s claim that he received ineffective assistance of counsel is without merit. The record demonstrates that trial counsel rendered meaningful representation to the defendant at all stages of the proceedings (People v Hobot, 84 NY2d 1021; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137).

Finally, the defendant may not now be heard to challenge the negotiated sentence which the court imposed (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). In any event, under the circumstances of this case, the sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Miller, J. P., Thompson, Joy and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Rivera
33 A.D.3d 942 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Whitaker
27 A.D.3d 499 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Spotards
23 A.D.3d 586 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Cobb
19 A.D.3d 506 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Reels
17 A.D.3d 488 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
People v. Williams
13 A.D.3d 661 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
People v. Javis
260 A.D.2d 579 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
240 A.D.2d 419, 658 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-coles-nyappdiv-1997.