People v. Javis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Javis

260 A.D.2d 579, 686 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4061

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 19, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 260 A.D.2d 579 (People v. Javis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Javis, 260 A.D.2d 579, 686 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4061 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J.), rendered February 7, 1997, convicting her of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that her plea of guilty was coerced and was the result of ineffective assistance of counsel is not preserved for appellate review (see, People v Coles, 240 AD2d 419; People v Leo, 255 AD2d 458; People v Lu Yang Tong, 238 AD2d 607).

The defendant’s contention that the sentence is excessive was effectively waived by her as part of her plea bargain (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J.), rendered February 7, 1997, convicting her of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that her plea of guilty was coerced and was the result of ineffective assistance of counsel is not preserved for appellate review (see, People v Coles, 240 AD2d 419; People v Leo, 255 AD2d 458; People v Lu Yang Tong, 238 AD2d 607).

The defendant’s contention that the sentence is excessive was effectively waived by her as part of her plea bargain (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D.2d 579, 686 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4061, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-javis-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack