People v. Cobb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Cobb

19 A.D.3d 506, 798 N.Y.S.2d 477

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 13, 2005

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 19 A.D.3d 506 (People v. Cobb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Cobb, 19 A.D.3d 506, 798 N.Y.S.2d 477 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Alessandro, J), rendered June 10, 2004, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was coerced into pleading guilty is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Clarke, 93 NY2d 904, 906 [1999]; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636, 637 [1983]; People v Coles, 240 AD2d 419 [1997]). In any event, nothing in the record of the plea allocution calls into question the voluntary, knowing, and intelligent nature of the defendant’s bargained-for plea (see People v Seeber, 4 NY3d 780 [2005]; People v Banister, 15 AD3d 497 [2005]). The defendant’s claim that his plea was the product of ineffective assistance of counsel was belied by his acknowledgment at the plea proceeding that he was satisfied with the representation of his attorney (see People v LaFurno, 8 AD3d 498 [2004]; People v Weekes, 289 AD2d 599 [2001]). Florio, J.P., Krausman, Crane, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Alessandro, J), rendered June 10, 2004, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was coerced into pleading guilty is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Clarke, 93 NY2d 904, 906 [1999]; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636, 637 [1983]; People v Coles, 240 AD2d 419 [1997]). In any event, nothing in the record of the plea allocution calls into question the voluntary, knowing, and intelligent nature of the defendant’s bargained-for plea (see People v Seeber, 4 NY3d 780 [2005]; People v Banister, 15 AD3d 497 [2005]). The defendant’s claim that his plea was the product of ineffective assistance of counsel was belied by his acknowledgment at the plea proceeding that he was satisfied with the representation of his attorney (see People v LaFurno, 8 AD3d 498 [2004]; People v Weekes, 289 AD2d 599 [2001]). Florio, J.P., Krausman, Crane, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.3d 506, 798 N.Y.S.2d 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-cobb-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack