People v. Coleman
This text of 461 N.W.2d 615 (People v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
As set forth in the concurring opinion, the search of Coleman’s purse did not amount to a search of her person.1 The search was permissible [126]*126as a search of a container in which items specified in the warrant might be found.2
Because the search of Coleman’s purse was not a search of her person, there is no need to consider Ybarra v Illinois, 444 US 85; 100 S Ct 338; 62 L Ed 2d 238 (1979), People v Arterberry, 431 Mich 381; 429 NW2d 574 (1988), or the other authorities cited in the concurring opinion concerning a search of a person.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
461 N.W.2d 615, 436 Mich. 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-coleman-mich-1990.