People v. Clark

283 A.D.2d 336, 725 N.Y.S.2d 37, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6261
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Clark. Read the opinion of the Court — 262 A.D.2d 1051

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura Visitacion-Lewis, J.), rendered May 12, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in refusing to discharge a juror who, after summations, expressed concerns about his self-employment status and potential loss of valuable time if jury deliberations were prolonged. The totality of his responses established that he was qualified for continued service. The juror stated that his business meetings could be resched[337]*337uled, and, while expressing a hope that deliberations would be brief, gave explicit assurances that his financial concerns would not affect his ability to reach a fair verdict (see, People v Melenciano, 281 AD2d 255). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Williams, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Clark, 283 A.D.2d 336, 725 N.Y.S.2d 37, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6261 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

283 A.D.2d 336 (People v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Melenciano
281 A.D.2d 255 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)