People v. Clark

262 A.D.2d 420, 691 N.Y.S.2d 313, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6263
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Clark. Read the opinion of the Court — 241 A.D.2d 710

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (McKay, J.), rendered March 12, 1997, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (four counts) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered the judgment is affirmed.

The charge given by the trial court was, as a whole, entirely proper (see, People v Sharlow, 185 AD2d 289, 290; People v Ladd, 89 NY2d 893, 894). The defendant’s contention that the court usurped the jury’s role by deciding a factual question in the iury’s province is without merit (cf., People v Mason, 219 AD2d 681, 682).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Krausman, J. P., McGinity, Feuerstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Clark, 262 A.D.2d 420, 691 N.Y.S.2d 313, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6263 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

262 A.D.2d 420 (People v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ladd
675 N.E.2d 1211 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)
People v. Sharlow
185 A.D.2d 289 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Mason
219 A.D.2d 681 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)