People v. Clark
This text of 223 A.D.2d 652 (People v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered March 27, 1995, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We have examined the record and find that the defendant’s plea of guilty was knowingly and voluntarily entered (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). Moreover, we find that the defendant received the effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137).
The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
223 A.D.2d 652, 637 N.Y.S.2d 317, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-clark-nyappdiv-1996.