People v. Clark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Clark

201 A.D.2d 493, 609 N.Y.S.2d 798

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 201 A.D.2d 493 (People v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Clark, 201 A.D.2d 493, 609 N.Y.S.2d 798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defen[494]*494dant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), rendered December 3, 1992, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered the judgment is affirmed.

Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the defendant’s plea was both factually sufficient and was entered into knowingly, intelligently, arid voluntarily (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). In addition, there is no basis to the defendant’s claim that counsel failed to provide meaningful representation (see, People v Jackson, 70 NY2d 768). Accordingly, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s application to withdraw his plea of guilty (see, CPL 220.60 [3]; People v Cance, 155 AD2d 764; People v Howard, 138 AD2d 525). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defen[494]*494dant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), rendered December 3, 1992, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered the judgment is affirmed.

Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the defendant’s plea was both factually sufficient and was entered into knowingly, intelligently, arid voluntarily (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). In addition, there is no basis to the defendant’s claim that counsel failed to provide meaningful representation (see, People v Jackson, 70 NY2d 768). Accordingly, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant’s application to withdraw his plea of guilty (see, CPL 220.60 [3]; People v Cance, 155 AD2d 764; People v Howard, 138 AD2d 525). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 A.D.2d 493, 609 N.Y.S.2d 798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-clark-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack