People v. Clark

253 A.D.2d 888, 678 N.Y.S.2d 516, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9848
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Clark. Read the opinion of the Court — 222 A.D.2d 446

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), both rendered February 7, 1996, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under Indictment No. 95-00496 and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree under Indictment No. 95-00552, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

[889]*889Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Clark, 253 A.D.2d 888, 678 N.Y.S.2d 516, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9848 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

253 A.D.2d 888 (People v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)