People v. Clark

223 A.D.2d 652, 637 N.Y.S.2d 317, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 445
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Clark. Read the opinion of the Court — 195 A.D.2d 988

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered March 27, 1995, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have examined the record and find that the defendant’s plea of guilty was knowingly and voluntarily entered (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). Moreover, we find that the defendant received the effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Clark, 223 A.D.2d 652, 637 N.Y.S.2d 317, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 445 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

223 A.D.2d 652 (People v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Harris
459 N.E.2d 170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)