People v. Castro

163 A.D.2d 879, 559 N.Y.S.2d 832, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9583
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Castro. Read the opinion of the Court — 174 A.D.2d 378

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, we conclude that defendant’s conviction of assault in the second degree (see, Penal Law § 120.05 [4]) is supported by legally sufficient evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the [880]*880weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, supra, at 495). Finally, defendant’s sentence was not harsh and excessive. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Connell, J.— assault, second degree.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Law-ton, Davis and Lowery, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Castro, 163 A.D.2d 879, 559 N.Y.S.2d 832, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9583 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

163 A.D.2d 879 (People v. Castro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bleakley
508 N.E.2d 672 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)