People v. Castro

138 A.D.2d 619, 526 N.Y.S.2d 769, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3073

This text of 138 A.D.2d 619 (People v. Castro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Castro, 138 A.D.2d 619, 526 N.Y.S.2d 769, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3073 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Moskowitz, J.), rendered April 1, 1985, convicting her of robbery in the second degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the adequacy of the plea allocution is not preserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit. Additionally, the imposed sentence which was specifically negotiated for by the defendant (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816), was neither harsh nor excessive under the circumstances of this case. Mollen, P. J., Lawrence, Eiber, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 A.D.2d 619, 526 N.Y.S.2d 769, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3073, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-castro-nyappdiv-1988.