People v. Castro

138 A.D.2d 619, 526 N.Y.S.2d 769, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3073
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Castro. Read the opinion of the Court — 115 A.D.2d 433

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Moskowitz, J.), rendered April 1, 1985, convicting her of robbery in the second degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the adequacy of the plea allocution is not preserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit. Additionally, the imposed sentence which was specifically negotiated for by the defendant (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816), was neither harsh nor excessive under the circumstances of this case. Mollen, P. J., Lawrence, Eiber, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Castro, 138 A.D.2d 619, 526 N.Y.S.2d 769, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3073 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

138 A.D.2d 619 (People v. Castro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)