People v. Campbell
69 A.D.3d 645, 891 N.Y.2d 291
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 5, 2010·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Since the defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed, he has no basis to now complain that his sentence was excessive (see People v Cash, 63 AD3d 1177 [2009]; People v Domin, 13 AD3d 391 [2004]; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816, 817 [1984]). Fisher, J.P, Santucci, Dickerson, Chambers and Lott, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Campbell, 69 A.D.3d 645, 891 N.Y.2d 291 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).
69 A.D.3d 645 (People v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Taylor
2026 NY Slip Op 00738 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026)
People v. Addimando
2021 NY Slip Op 04364 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Jessup
90 A.D.3d 782 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
STANFORD, JAMES RALPH, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011
People v. Stanford
87 A.D.3d 1367 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)