People v. Campbell

63 A.D.3d 754, 879 N.Y.S.2d 729
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Campbell. Read the opinion of the Court — 62 A.D.3d 1265

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Konviser, J.), rendered July 13, 2006, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant has failed to demonstrate that he possesses the requisite standing (cf. Powers v Ohio, 499 US 400, 410-415 [1991]) to assert that the public’s First Amendment right to attend his trial was violated as a result of the procedures employed by the trial court in conducting a Hinton hearing in this case (see People v Hinton, 31 NY2d 71 [1972], cert denied 410 US 911 [1973]). Mastro, J.E, Covello, Eng and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Campbell, 63 A.D.3d 754, 879 N.Y.S.2d 729 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

63 A.D.3d 754 (People v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Powers v. Ohio
499 U.S. 400 (Supreme Court, 1991)
People v. Hinton
286 N.E.2d 265 (New York Court of Appeals, 1972)