People v. Campbell

62 A.D.3d 535, 878 N.Y.S.2d 620
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Campbell. Read the opinion of the Court — 62 A.D.3d 1265

Opinion

Judgment, [536]*536Supreme Court, Bronx County (David Stadtmauer, J.), rendered March 14, 2007, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 17 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court’s Sandoval ruling, which permitted the People to elicit defendant’s prior sex crime conviction without inquiring into any underlying facts, balanced the appropriate factors and was a proper exercise of discretion (see People v Hayes, 97 NY2d 203 [2002]; People v Pavao, 59 NY2d 282, 292 [1983]).

Defendant’s Confrontation Clause claim, relating to DNA test documents, is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject it on the merits (see People v Freycinet, 11 NY3d 38, 42 [2008]; People v Rawlins, 10 NY3d 136, 153-160 [2008]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Catterson and Moskowitz, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Campbell, 62 A.D.3d 535, 878 N.Y.S.2d 620 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

62 A.D.3d 535 (People v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rawlins
884 N.E.2d 1019 (New York Court of Appeals, 2008)
People v. Hayes
764 N.E.2d 963 (New York Court of Appeals, 2002)
People v. Freycinet
892 N.E.2d 843 (New York Court of Appeals, 2008)
People v. Pavao
451 N.E.2d 216 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)