People v. Bunnell

63 A.D.3d 1727, 880 N.Y.S.2d 602
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 19, 2009·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Upon the Court’s own motion, the memorandum and order entered February 6, 2009 (59 AD3d 942 [2009], amended on rearg 63 AD3d 1671 [2009]) is further amended by deleting “as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and” from the ordering paragraph and by deleting the fifth sentence of the memorandum and substituting the following sentences: “We reach this issue sua sponte, and we note that preservation is not required inasmuch as the ‘ “essential nature” of the right to be sentenced as provided by law’ is implicated (People v Fuller, 57 NY2d 152, 156 [1982]). To the extent that People v Jackson (23 AD3d 1057 [2005], Iv denied 6 NY3d 814 [2006]) holds otherwise, it is no longer to be followed.” Present: Smith, J.P., Centra, Feradotto and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bunnell, 63 A.D.3d 1727, 880 N.Y.S.2d 602 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

63 A.D.3d 1727 (People v. Bunnell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

JOSEPH, III, RAYMOND E., PEOPLE v
90 A.D.3d 1646 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Aquino
83 A.D.3d 1532 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Mullings
81 A.D.3d 1360 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Brusie
70 A.D.3d 1395 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Williams
64 A.D.3d 1136 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Weber
64 A.D.3d 1185 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)