People v. Bunnell

63 A.D.3d 1671, 879 N.Y.S.2d 801
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 5, 2009·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Motion for reargument and other relief granted to the extent that, upon reargument, the memorandum and order entered February 6, 2009 (59 AD3d 942 [2009]) is amended by adding the following sentences before the last sentence of the memorandum: “It cannot be said that the procedure utilized by the court is authorized by People v Fuller (57 NY2d 152 [1982]). Indeed, the court attorney did not act merely as a ‘preliminary fact finder’ (id. at 158) but, rather, he conducted an adversarial hearing and made credibility determinations, thereby assuming a role specifically limited to the authority of the court (see Penal Law § 60.27 [2]; Fuller, 57 NY2d at 158-159).” Present—Smith, J.P, Centra, Peradotto and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Bunnell, 63 A.D.3d 1671, 879 N.Y.S.2d 801 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

63 A.D.3d 1671 (People v. Bunnell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hensley
2024 NY Slip Op 02650 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
JOSEPH, III, RAYMOND E., PEOPLE v
90 A.D.3d 1646 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Aquino
83 A.D.3d 1532 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Mullings
81 A.D.3d 1360 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Brusie
70 A.D.3d 1395 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Williams
64 A.D.3d 1136 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Weber
64 A.D.3d 1185 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Joseph
63 A.D.3d 1659 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)