People v. Jackson

14 A.D.3d 715, 789 N.Y.S.2d 248, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 755
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 31, 2005
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 14 A.D.3d 715 (People v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Jackson, 14 A.D.3d 715, 789 N.Y.S.2d 248, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 755 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowling, J.), rendered September 10, 2002, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he could have been convicted only of intentional murder (see Penal Law § 125.25 [1]), and that the evidence was legally insufficient to support a conviction of depraved indifference murder (see Penal Law § 125.25 [2]; People v Payne, 3 NY3d 266 [2004]) is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]), and we decline to reach the issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see CPL 470.15 [3] [c]; [6] [a]).

[716]*716Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Crane and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Jackson
30 A.D.3d 614 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 A.D.3d 715, 789 N.Y.S.2d 248, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-jackson-nyappdiv-2005.