People v. Bulwer

2023 NY Slip Op 04736
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 26, 2023
DocketInd. No. 1814/18 Appeal No. 601 Case No. 2022-02024
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2023 NY Slip Op 04736 (People v. Bulwer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Bulwer, 2023 NY Slip Op 04736 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

People v Bulwer (2023 NY Slip Op 04736)
People v Bulwer
2023 NY Slip Op 04736
Decided on September 26, 2023
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: September 26, 2023
Before: Renwick, P.J., Moulton, Kennedy, Scarpulla, Higgitt, JJ.

Ind. No. 1814/18 Appeal No. 601 Case No. 2022-02024

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

James Bulwer, Defendant-Appellant.


Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Katheryne M. Martone of counsel), for appellant.

Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Meghan McLoughlin of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura A. Ward, J.), entered on or about April 19, 2022, which adjudicated defendant a risk level two sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see generally People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861 [2014]). Defendant, who was 55 years old at the time of the underlying offense, did not demonstrate that he posed a lower risk of reoffense due to his age (see People v Rodriguez, 145 AD3d 489, 490 [1st Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 916 [2017]). The other mitigating factors defendant cites were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument, and all the alleged mitigating factors are outweighed by the seriousness of the underlying offense (see People v Etheridge, 149 AD3d 446, 446 [1st Dept 2017], lv denied 29 NY3d 912 [2017]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: September 26, 2023



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Bulwer
2023 NY Slip Op 04736 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2023 NY Slip Op 04736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-bulwer-nyappdiv-2023.