People v. Etheridge
This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 2734 (People v. Etheridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Neil E. Ross, J.), entered May 11, 2015, which adjudicated defendant a level two sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court providently exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). Defendant’s long period of law abiding conduct after being released from custody was outweighed by the seriousness of the underlying crime, in which defendant repeatedly raped a young child over a period of months. Even if defendant’s clean record for a period of years made him *447 significantly less likely to reoffend, the magnitude of harm that would result if he did reoffend establishes a valid reason for denial of a downward departure (see People v Cabrera, 91 AD3d 479 [2012], lv denied 19 NY3d 801 [2012]).
The remaining mitigating factors cited by defendant were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument, or were outweighed by the seriousness of the underlying sex offense.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 NY Slip Op 2734, 149 A.D.3d 446, 49 N.Y.S.3d 625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-etheridge-nyappdiv-2017.