People v. Brown

105 A.D.3d 1466, 963 N.Y.S.2d 907
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 26, 2013·No. Appeal No. 2·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Motion for writ of error coram nobis granted. Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel because counsel failed to raise an issue on direct appeal that would have resulted in reversal, specifically, County Court’s deference to the decision of defendant to forgo a jury charge for lesser included offenses denied him the expert judgment of counsel, to which the Sixth Amendment entitles him. Upon our review of the motion papers, we conclude that the issue may have merit. Therefore, the order of June 6, 2008 is vacated and this Court will consider the appeal de novo (see People v LeFrois, 151 AD2d 1046 [1989]). Defendant is directed to file and serve his records and briefs with this Court on or before July 25, 2013.

Present—Smith, J.E, Fahey, Peradotto and Lindley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Brown, 105 A.D.3d 1466, 963 N.Y.S.2d 907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

105 A.D.3d 1466 (People v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

BROWN, GERMAINE, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
People v. Brown
117 A.D.3d 1536 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)