People v. Brown

73 A.D.3d 940, 899 N.Y.S.2d 877
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 11, 2010·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered August 9, 2007, convicting him of rape in the first degree (two counts), attempted rape in the first degree, criminal sexual assault in the first degree (two counts), and robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Órdered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the trial court did not err in refusing to give an intoxication charge to the jury (see Penal Law § 15.25). Viewing the intoxication evidence in the light most favorable to the defendant (see People v Gaines, 83 NY2d 925, 927 [1994]), we find that it was insufficient to allow a reasonable person to entertain a doubt as to the element of [941]*941intent (id.; see People v Sirico, 66 AD3d 1047 [2009]; People v Garcia, 271 AD2d 695 [2000]; People v Hernandez, 161 AD2d 664 [1990]; People v Rodriguez, 155 AD2d 627 [1989], affd 76 NY2d 918 [1990]). Dillon, J.P., Miller, Dickerson and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Brown, 73 A.D.3d 940, 899 N.Y.S.2d 877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

73 A.D.3d 940 (People v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rodriguez
92 A.D.3d 902 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Oddone
89 A.D.3d 868 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Albanese
84 A.D.3d 1107 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)